Another great contribution on the petition

Some signatories on the petition write some great blog posts - here's one from yesterday.

Strathmore and Russell School are at the heart of Petersham and the Conservation Area – integral to the Petersham Road, core to the view from Petersham Hill, unobtrusive along the boundary with the Avenue that leads towards Ham House, subservient to Ham Lands with low density single storey buildings, providing a corridor of green space between Petersham Road and Ham Lands. School buildings and play areas are unobtrusive and distributed giving a rural primary school setting. Light and noise pollution is distributed across a wide area and again unobtrusive. There is no sense of being overlooked on all boundaries. It supports wildlife that benefits from its extensive green and open space and this rural aspect provides a unique setting for children to enjoy and this was recently recognized by Ofsted. So, as local residents, it is with considerable concern that we find ourselves in the midst of a consultation for and on behalf of the school – providing limited opportunity for the local community to participate and be heard because “their views” are not considered relevant at this time of the consultation. This proposal is unacceptable

The Petition - a clarification

I was asked by a council officer if I would clarify on this blog the role of the petition, and in the spirit of open-ness - and hopefully following last night's residents meeting, more co-operation on both sides - I am happy to do this.

The petition - which continues to grow - is an open petition, which means anyone with an interest in the issue is free to sign it. However, it is aimed primarily at local residents in Ham and Petersham, and parents of pupils at the schools.

I understand some people under the age of 18, and also outside the borough, have signed the petition and I am happy to accept this is the case. I cannot remove these names, partly as I do not know who exactly these are, and also because regardless of that, there is no reason why they shouldn't express a view.

But I would like to clarify that the primary purpose of the petition is to represent local opposition to the sale of school land.

If further clarification is needed, I am happy to oblige.

A local resident writes...

"We have been reading, with interest, your opposition to the plans to redevelop the existing School site with the loss of school land and at the same time increasing numbers at the school itself.

Clearly, the loss of more school land is to be opposed and most people would heartily agree with that, however, the merits of the educational issues we would wish to leave to others more expert and more personally involved.

As local residents of Meadlands Drive we have a major issue with traffic congestion and parking as a result of a similar recent redevelopment at the German School which has vastly increased the amount of traffic flow in this and surrounding roads resulting in us becoming the German School Car Park Extension.

We have been in correspondence with the Council since the end of last year on the subject.

We feel that the proposed development will only exacerbate this problem with increased pupil numbers and the development of residential accommodation and would oppose these plans on this basis alone. Any further increase in vehicular traffic would not only affect local residents but would affect access to the new school and have implications with regard to the safety of children travelling on foot".

If you would like your comments published on the campaign blog, do forward them to parentsinpetersham@gmail.com and we will post them here

A letter from a concerned parent to Nick Whitfield

We have received the following wonderful letter from a concerned local resident and parent at the Russell School. It echoes the feelings of so many local people. We would be happy to publish other letters from local residents and parents from either school.

Dear Mr Whitfield,

 

I would like to reply to the consultation at The Russell School on January 31st 2013. The time allocated for the meeting was 4.30-6pm. This time consisted largely of continuous lectures at the audience which contained very little relevant information to underpin the proposed plan of the changes to the Russell site. The time frame was in stark contrast to the time then given to open questions from the audience. I feel that at best almost all questions put forward by the audience were left unanswered and at worst your replies talked once again at the audience containing little relevance the each question asked. Again filling our precious time with yet more unrelated constructed facts. The reasoning put forward was self-serving and filled with innocuous examples, i.e. other schools, other maintenance issues, other children which had no bearing to the issues now at Russell School. The Council's presentation was ineffective as it lacked any actual supporting concrete evidence. The proposal was put forward as a fait accompli, littered with scaremongering facts chosen to present the proposed plan in it's best light. I was startled by lack of knowledge about the current Russell school, its environment, and the children which attend. I did not recognise this description and felt the Russell School was misrepresented.

A more successful use of our only meeting may have been to have an actual discussion in how future school provision can be provided in our borough for our children. To dress up the council proposal as a "moral obligation" hides the real actual story which is the selling of school land. The only "moral obligation" would have been to have presented a fair, open, honest, straightforward, and factual consultation. Instead of the actual continuous lecture, merging into a continuous statement of bluster, irrelevant talk full of unconnected reasoning put forward to suit the council's proposal.

I understand there is an economic need based on the financial shortfall in Richmond Council. As this is a pure funding issue there no evidence or educational argument to support this proposal. Ofsted has also offered no evidence that Russell is shortchanging its' children due to its state of repair and dependence on its outdoor space. Had we have seen relevant feasibility studies that brought the council to the current solution or indeed any other viable alternatives we would have the possibility to believe the alternative would be the best outcome for our children, the Starthmore children and the Richmond borough children needing future educational provision.The proposal lacked clarity and was based on facts cherry picked to show the Russell School can only survive by selling land, yet none of the other sites for the schools integration are required to do so. I heard a pointless lecture rather than an effective consultation. Were our concerns acknowledged and discussed or indeed sufficient answers given I may have drawn a different conclusion towards the council's proposal.

It may provide future dry space under non-leaking roofs, but in doing so you take away the opportunity for our children to enjoy the outdoors and learning in an open green environment which the current government immensely supports. The new school will have less outside space for the children to play and learn even before it doubles it size. Currently, the school has separate paying areas for the Nursery, Infants and Junior pupils. The proposed smaller site can reduce this opportunity. Our children would inherit the problems other schools are having to struggle with far too many children in an inclosed space - as currently experienced at Fern Hill, Latchmere and Marshgate. I chose the Russell School based on its separate and open play areas, the Russell also currently has two Halls for each part of the school to use age appropriately. It is not the academic space per square metre that make it right for the children.

Sadly,only one view, one consultation with only a yes or no outcome was put forward.The council does not recognise that we as parents, teachers, carers, residents are very happy to share our school in any form it takes with any child that lives in Richmond. The only issue I have is that it relies on selling school land and reducing its current footprint. I fail to see the "moral obligation" the council has in sell off school land in order to double the intake on a smaller plot.

 

200 more Homes leafletted in Ham and Petersham

Over the next 24 hours 200 more local homes will have been leafletted by the campaign. If you can help us deliver leaflets, especially this weekend ahead of the Residents Meeting on Monday (6pm at Ham Youth Centre) then please let us know by e mailing us at parentsinpetersham@gmail.com

Ham and Petersham Association to discuss plans THIS FRIDAY

The Ham and Petersham Association are to hold an ad hoc committee meeting this Friday to discuss the plans and agree a response.

Please contact them at chair@hamandpetersham.com to tell them why you are opposed to these plans

One Year left to stop them building on The Russell. Tell them NO, before it’s too late.

 Last week it was announced by the council that they have revised the timetable for the development. We now have just a year to stop the Bulldozers moving onto The Russell and Strathmore schools

Planning brief Consultation: June-Oct 2103

Pre Planning: Nov/Dec 13

Statutory Planning Jan/Feb 14

Planning permission: March 2014

New Build available: Sept 2015

Obviously this doesn't take into account any legal delays such as judicial reviews.

Please object to these plans by ticking strongly disagree and 'No' on the council feedback form and signing the petition against these plans

The Russell School Meeting

Great to see so many people at the meeting with the Council where the plans were outlined to parents teachers and governors of The Russell school. Their plan is:

1. Sell Strathmore and all of The Russell Infants area to developers

2. Bulldoze all existing building and build one large new ('more efficient' ) building in the centre of the site.

3. The  combined new school will have a smaller overall footprint than the current Russell school does, and also less play areas for the children (despite parents being told by the school last October saying that they had been told by The Council that  'there was a clear assurance that greenfield space, playground space or environmental areas would not be diminished'. This is no longer the case)

4. There will also be an additional 120 children put into The Russell in 4 classes.

So more children in less space

It was also made plain that should The Russell School reject the plans, the existing school buildings would not be rebuilt (despite being described as not fit for purpose in the meeting) and we were a very likely candidate to be 'named' by The Council as having an extra class entry anyway, which would  involve 'plonking a portacabin on the playground'. This was described as the worst of both worlds - though the Head of Childrens Services was at pains to make clear this was not a threat, just a likely scenario. 

I don't think I am misrepresenting the plan but if some feel I am, do please send me your views which I will circulate on the e mail list.

Under questionning, Nick Whitfield acknowledged that the Council hadn't applied for central government funding (through the Priority School Building programme) principally because they were told they would only get one application succesfully through and the Kew school that got it in our borough was in a far worse state than The Russell. This seemed rather at odds with his earlier 'not fit for purpose' comments about The Russell. In fact the advice the council has been given appears to be wrong. 58 seperate local authorities got multliple applications through via the PSB system in 2012, including in London: Brent (2), Bromley (2) Camden (2) Greenwich (5) Harrow (8), Hillingdon (3) Lambeth (5)  and Newham (2). 

Many other parents also raised the issues of the disruption to children at the school while this continues. This is clearly of major concern to many parents.

Thursday 31 Jan . 4.30pm. Russell School Consultation Meeting

Please come if you can possibly can, to the parents consultation meeting at The Russell School at 4.30 pm today, 31 Jan.

It's so important that we tell the council just how opposed we are to these plans.

Thank You

What parents and local residents are saying

Some quotes from the petition against this scheme, which is now well into three figures - if you haven't signed it, just click this link.

 I was born in Richmond 73 years ago. Lived in Ham and Petersham for 62 of these years. My youngest daughter attended Petersham Russell School and then Greycourt School. My Grandaughter attended Petersham Russell and a few years ago became a member of the staff at Strathmore. All three of the schools have excellant reputations and I feel very strongly about the the changes being made. I still feel the loss of the icerink by meddling polititians making money by selling off land, and in the case of the icerink bad negotiations leaving the young people without the joy I had as a child. PLEASE LEAVE OUR SCHOOLS ALONE.

Both of my boys went to The Russell and one of the reasons that we chose it was for the large site surrounded by open space. These proposals would destroy the nature of the school and the surrounding area.

No - it would detract from learning for Russell School kids No - it would probably detract from Strathmore children compared with their current setup No - it would reduce the green/sports/open space per child No - it would create havoc with transport No - it would create congestion and confusion in shared hallways No - the two schools are too different to allow either to become best in class. We will end up with one school that is mediocre at both.

Outrageous mugging of a local community and with no attempt to disguise the commercial interests behind the amalgamation of 2 schools and the reduction of their free space

I am wholly opposed to selling off the land of Strathmore or Russell School. This sets a precedent for taking away our green space - something that is unique to London and this particular area we live in. The traffic is already horrendous with the parents of The German School dropping their children off just before the drop off of Russell children. There have been many times when I have a seen a near miss with a child and car - how does this proposal keep the children in the school area safe.

Why are extensive refurbishment proposals for both schools not being costed properly and considered? If funds are limited at times such as these then surely this is the most sensible approach, instead of demolishing what could be a wonderful set of buildings and re-building from scratch A HIGHER CAPACITY SCHOOL ON A SMALLER SITE. There seems to be very little logic to what is being proposed!


There's lots more comment at the petition - please sign it and also go the council website and tell the council you disagree with these proposals on their feedback form.

Thanks

TEXT of this weekends leaflets

We thought it was a good idea to put the text of this weekends leaflets up on the blog so you can get the embedded links of the petition, where to register your opposition with the council etc.

Here it is

DON’T LET THEM BUILD ON STRATHMORE & THE RUSSELL SCHOOL

Plans are being pushed through to merge Strathmore School on Meadlands Drive into three other local schools – The Russell School, Grey Court and Clifden. The plans involve the sale of all Strathmore School and large parts of The Russell School to developers, and also putting a huge new building on the remaining Russell land.

Concerned parents at The Russell School are opposed to selling school land and are campaigning against these proposals. We don’t want new houses built on school land. In addition, we are worried about the effect on the local environment of the proposal to also double the intake at Russell (as well as merge in Strathmore) and proposals to build an enormous two story new building at The Russell.

While we would welcome better facilities for both sets of children, we do not believe this should be funded by selling any school land to developers.

Russell School parents voted against these plans at the informal consultation stage but their views were ignored by the Council.

If you would like to help the campaign, there are a number of things you can do, which are listed overleaf. But the most important are

1.     Visit the council website and register your opposition to these plans. If you cannot find the form to register your opposition, visit our campaign website at www.notosellingpetershamschoolland.blogspot.co.uk where there is a link to the feedback form. This is also the only place you can see the plans on line

2.     Attend the public meeting at Ham Youth Centre on Monday 11 Feb at 6.00 pm and tell the Council what you think of their plans

PLEASE DONT LET THEM BUILD HOUSES ON SCHOOL LAND

WANT TO STOP THEM BUILDING ON SCHOOL LAND?

1.     Visit the council website and register your opposition to these plans. If you cannot find the form to register your opposition, visit our campaign website at www.notosellingpetershamschoolland.blogspot.co.uk where there is a link to the feedback form

2.     Attend the public meeting at Ham Youth Centre on 11 Feb at 6.0 pm and tell the Council what you think of their plans

3.     Visit our campaign blog at for regular updates www.notosellingpetershamschoolland.blogspot.co.uk/ where you can sign our petition on line

4.     Sign our petition direct - http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dont-sell-off-school-land-in-petersham/blog

5.     Write expressing your concerns to the Council Officers in charge of this project:

Robert Henderson, Assistant Director, Protective and Preventative Services

( r.henderson@richmond.gov.uk )

Nick Whitfield, Director of Children's services (nick.whitfield@richmond.gov.uk)

Gillian Norton, Chief Executive, (g.norton@richmond.gov.uk)

6.     Visit our Facebook Page and tick ‘like’ http://www.facebook.com/SayNoToSellingSchoolLandInPetersham or follow us on Twitter @petershamparent

7.     Ask to be added to our e mail updates by e mailing parentsinpetersham@gmail.com or volunteer to help

8.     Write to our local Councilors and MP

Brian Miller  cllr.BMiller@richmond.gov.uk             David Williams  cllr.DWilliams@richmond.gov.uk

Sue Jones   cllr.SJones@richmond.gov.uk             Zac Goldsmith  Zac@Zacgoldsmith.com

Together, we can get better facilities for local schools – and stop the Council selling school land in Petersham to developers.

New Readers

Hi

As a result of the leaflets, we are getting new hits on the blog, so welcome and thank you for helping us stop the Council selling School land in Petersham to developers.

To see the plan the Council want to get through, click here. The plans are not available on the Council website.

To go to the Council site and register your opposition to the plans, please go here

To sign the petition against the plan, click here. Signing the petition and registering your opposition to the plans are very important so please please please take a moment to do so.

Please also write to the Council Officers who are pushing these plans through and our local councillors and MP - all contact details can be found on the right hand column of this blog.

And Please Please Please come to the public meeting at Ham Youth Centre at 6 pm on 11 Feb.

If you would like to help the campaign, e mail us at parentsinpetersham@gmail.com. If you give us your e mail address we'll also send you regular updates.

Thank you for helping us stop the Council selling school land to developers.

We are all for new facilities for the children at both schools. We don't agree that selling off school land is the appropriate way to pay for it, nor has the Council investigated any other form of funding to get it done.

Can you help?

We are leafletting local residents this weekend to alert them to the Councils plans to sell these huge areas of Russell and Strathmore School land to developers and build a huge new building on The Russell school site (and double Russell school numbers as well as merge in Strathmore).

Can you help deliver leaflets? Please contact the campaign at parentsinpetersham@gmail.com and we'll get right back to you.

DON"T LET THEM BUILD  NEW HOUSING ON SCHOOL LAND

Council reveal their hand. It's far worse than we thought

The Council revealed their plans last night at a meeting for Strathmore Parents.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, they are far more extensive than revealed previously

They appear to propose selling something like 25% of Russell land to developers and building a two storey building, as well as selling all of Strathmore to developers

They also propose making The Russell School a two form entry

Twice as many children plus all of Strathmore's children (and they are also increasing Strathmore numbers) on an area just 75% of the current Russell School site.

It is a disgrace. Please let them know we will not stand for it by voicing your opposition here.

Needless to say, this is the only place you can see these plans - the Council are not putting them on line

Planned Development (click image to enlarge). The land the Council wants to sell to developers are the large block on the Meadlands Drive side of the school and the Strathmore site on the left of the picture.

Current School Footprint (Click to Enlarge)

Parents views ignored

The council has ignored the majority views of Russell School parents, and proceeded to formal consultation on the plans to sell Strathmore and Russell School land to developers.

Please Please Please let them know you oppose their plans to build on school land by registering your opposition at the consultation feedback form on this link as a matter of urgency.

Thank you